Mashrabaمشربة

About this text: The Sanctification of the Sun

تقديس الشمس

Suhrawardī (549–587/1154–1191)

His prayer to Hūrakhsh, the sun, with the daily sanctification of the Highest.

On the Platonic Current: Suhrawardī

12 passages · ~10 min · audio

651 words

  • Audio: Arabic and English
  • Published translation: none (the English is AI, marked as such)

Not yet: commentaries.

much rare vocabulary

Lexical difficulty, from the words themselves: how many roots fall outside the 1,000 most frequent in the Quran, how long the words are, and how much of the vowelling had to be supplied by AI. It says how unfamiliar the vocabulary is, not how deep the ideas are.

Rare roots 14% · mean word length 4.9 letters · AI vowelling on 100% of words

Themes & resonances

What the text is about, and what it connects to across the history of thought. Every connection says what kind of claim it is: a documented lineage, a shared source, a resonance with no influence claimed, or a contrast. Mapped by AI; references are shown only once checked. Across the library

  • The Light of Light, hidden by the intensity of its own manifestnessنورnūrroot نور
  • The sun as vicegerent and the victorial lightsقاهرqāhirroot قهر
  • The ordered heavens and the sun in the fourth sphereفلكfalakroot فلك
  • The chain of causes and fathersعلةʿillaroot علل
  • Sanctification and praise by negationتقديسtaqdīsroot قدس
  • The sphere's love and the soul's longingشوقshawqroot شوق
  • Drowning in the seas of lightغرقgharqroot غرق
  • A weekly litany for the day of the sunوردwirdroot ورد
What each theme is here
  • The Light of Light, hidden by the intensity of its own manifestness. God is addressed as the Light of Light (nūr al-nūr), who has veiled Himself by the intensity of His manifestness and the perfection of His luminosity (10), while the sun's light is traced back through a chain of lights that ends in His (3).
  • The sun as vicegerent and the victorial lights. The sun, Hūrakhsh, is called the vicegerent of the Light of Light in the world of bodies and the shadow and talisman of its intellect, and it is asked to pass the prayer upward through the dominating (victorial) lights (2, 4).
  • The ordered heavens and the sun in the fourth sphere. The sun moves in its sphere without rupture, generation or corruption, set in the fourth sphere at the middle of the order of the All, and governs day, night and the seasons (1, 3, 4).
  • The chain of causes and fathers. The prayer climbs a ladder of causes: the sun asks its intellect, the intellects ask the first Intellect, and that Intellect asks the God of gods, the Causer of causes (4, 7).
  • Sanctification and praise by negation. The daily sanctification denies to God quality, quantity, place and every accident, allowing such words only as expression requires, and calls Him the one 'praised by negation' (11, 12).
  • The sphere's love and the soul's longing. The sun moves in love for its Maker's majesty and in longing for it, and the one who prays asks to become one of those who yearn for God and for longing to meet Him (1, 3, 5, 12).
  • Drowning in the seas of light. The sanctified essences are drowned in the seas of God's lights and effaced in the radiance of His glory, and they see Him without comprehending Him (9, 11).
  • A weekly litany for the day of the sun. The text is a set of litanies (awrād) for Sunday, joining a greeting to the sun with a daily sanctification of the Highest that closes in a pilgrim's cry, 'Here I am' (1, 6, 12).

Lineage 6

Documented transmission: a chain of reading, teaching, translation or citation, grounded in a verified reference or in the later text itself.

Resonance, not influence 7

Resonance, not influence: a structural or thematic likeness. No influence is claimed.

  • al-Ghazālī, The Niche of Lights: God hidden by the intensity of His lightSufism · firm

    al-Ghazālī argues that light is manifestness and that God's light is hidden because of its intensity and because nothing contrasts with it. The prayer says the same thing in address: You have veiled Yourself by the very intensity of Your manifestness. The texts share the Light Verse and the vocabulary of manifestness; this entry claims no direct dependence.

    Carried byظهورẓuhūrroot ظهر“manifestness”

    In the library:Mishkāt al-anwār ¶45Mishkāt al-anwār ¶68Mishkāt al-anwār ¶59Path: Light and its veils

  • Plato, Republic VI (508b-509b): the sun as offspring of the GoodPlatonism · probable

    Plato makes the sun the visible likeness of the Good, giving light and growth as the Good gives intelligibility and being. Suhrawardī calls the sun a likeness of God's majesty and His vicegerent among bodies. The images match closely, but the Republic was not available in Arabic in full, so no direct reading is claimed.

    Carried byمثالmithālroot مثلἔκγονοςekgonos“likeness, offspring”

  • The Emperor Julian, Hymn to King HeliosNeoplatonism · firm

    Julian's fourth-century hymn praises the sun as a king who mediates between the intelligible gods and the visible world, and who is the image of the Good. Suhrawardī's King of the stars, vicegerent of the Light of Light, holds the same middle place. The resemblance comes from a shared Platonic cosmos; no reading of Julian is claimed.

    Carried byἭλιοςHēlios“king sun”

  • Picatrix (Ghāyat al-ḥakīm): planetary prayers of the Ḥarrānian SabiansHermetism · probable

    The Arabic Picatrix preserves prayers addressed to each planet, the sun included, on its own day. Suhrawardī's Sunday greeting to Hūrakhsh has the same form; his version sets the sun inside a strictly monotheistic ascent to the Necessary Existent.

    Carried by“planetary prayer”

  • Francis of Assisi, Canticle of the Creatures: Brother SunChristian mysticism (Latin West) · firm

    Francis praises God for Brother Sun, 'who is day, and by him You give us light', saying the sun bears the likeness of the Most High. Suhrawardī, a few decades earlier, calls the sun maker of the day by God's command and a likeness of His majesty. The two poems share a devotion to the sun as a sign that praises its maker.

    Carried by“likeness (significatione)”

  • Dionysius the Areopagite, Mystical Theology: the darkness of excess lightEarly Christianity and the Fathers · probable

    Dionysius speaks of a divine darkness that is unapproachable light, and of praising God by removing attributes. The prayer's God is hidden by too much light and praised by negation. The two share a Neoplatonic grammar of negation, reached by separate routes.

    Carried byἀπόφασιςapophasis“negation”

  • The Gāyatrī mantra (Rig Veda 3.62.10) to SavitṛVedanta and Hindu thought · probable

    The Vedic prayer meditates on the splendour of the sun god Savitṛ and asks it to stir our thoughts. Suhrawardī asks, through the sun and the lights above it, that God illumine his soul with holy flashes and divine sciences. Both treat sunlight and the light of understanding as one petition.

    Carried by“illumine the mind”

Contrast 2

An instructive opposite: the difference teaches something about both.

  • The Quran on Abraham and the setting sun (Q 6:76-79), as read in al-Ghazālī's Niche of LightsQuran and hadith · firm

    Abraham turns away from star, moon and sun because they set, and turns his face to the One who originated the heavens. Suhrawardī greets the sun with peace and asks it to intercede, while also calling it obedient to its Originator. Read beside Abraham's refusal, the prayer shows how far a creature can be honoured before honour becomes worship.

    Carried byأفلafalaroot أفل“setting”

    In the library:Mishkāt al-anwār ¶83Mishkāt al-anwār ¶84

  • Ibn ʿArabī, The Litanies of SundayAkbarian tradition (after Ibn Arabi) · probable

    Both are Sunday litanies from the same decades. Ibn ʿArabī's addresses God directly through His names, while Suhrawardī's first greets the sun and sends the request up a chain of intermediary lights. They agree on the closing thought, that God is veiled by His own light.

    Carried byوردwirdroot ورد“litany”

    In the library:Awrād: Sunday ¶10Awrād: Sunday ¶16al-Ṣalāt al-fayḍiyya ¶9

Claude (opus) via Claude Code, headless, no web access, 2026-09-28. A reference with a check was found and checked with a web search.

14 layers, each with its licence

The original

MS AyaSofya 2144 (AY)Sulaymān b. Masʿūd b. al-Ḥasan · Ramaḍān 652/Oct.–Nov. 1254Public domain
By
Sulaymān b. Masʿūd b. al-Ḥasan (scribe) · Ramaḍān 652/Oct.–Nov. 1254
Source:
MS Istanbul, Süleymaniye, AyaSofya 2144, ff. 1a–27b (the whole al-Wāridāt wa-l-taqdīsāt; colophon f. 27a); the Sun f. 20b l. 12 – f. 21b l. 8, the Supreme Sanctification f. 19b l. 7 – f. 20b l. 11. Read from the reproduction in Wahid Azal, The Prayers to the Orient of Light (Library of the Greatest Name 10, Brisbane 2025), PDF pp. 316–318
In the reader:
Through our transcription, in full (12 passages, 651 words)
Licence:
The manuscript is public domain. The reproduction it was read from (Azal 2025; the Süleymaniye scan terms unknown) is in copyright: its images are kept private and not shown
Notes
Piątak's siglum أ. Naskh, 17 lines, nearly fully pointed, partly vowelled. The oldest and complete witness, and the base of Piątak's edition. Azal 2025 misdates it 625; the colophon reads «سنة اثني وخمسين وستمائة» (652).
Piątak's critical editionŁukasz Piątak · 2019Copyrighted: cited only
By
Łukasz Piątak (editor) · 2019
Source:
Łukasz Piątak, Between philosophy, mysticism and magic. A critical edition of occult writings of and attributed to Shihāb al-Dīn al-Suhrawardī, PhD, University of Warsaw, 2019, §2.3.8 (pp. 146–150) and §2.3.9 (pp. 150–154), text and apparatus · link ↗
In the reader:
Cited only: the 32 places where our reading of AY differs from his constituted text, as short lemmata with his apparatus note; his text is not reproduced
Licence:
Thesis in copyright (the repository's rights field says "FairUse"); Poland may also give a neighbouring right in critical editions (UNVERIFIED). Compared privately; cited only
Notes
Paragraphs: the Sun = (114)–(117), the Supreme Sanctification = (107)–(113). His apparatus sigla: ل Ahmet III 3271, م Ahmet III 3217, ر Ragıp Paşa 1480, and others; printed sources S, H, M, T. Of the 32 differences: 21 substantive readings of AY his apparatus reports, 3 where our emendation agrees with his text, 1 apparatus disagreement (n. 1167, «أنت الله»), 7 readings of AY his apparatus does not record. His PDF's text layer has font-mapping errors, so the pages were read as images.
UNVERIFIED:
Whether Polish law (Art. 99³ of the copyright act) gives Piątak's edition a neighbouring right is not verified.
MSS Ahmet III 3271 and 3217 (via Piątak)Piątak · 708/1308 (Ahmet III 3271, Kāshān); 3217 UNVERIFIEDPublic domain
By
Piątak (reports their readings in his apparatus) · 708/1308 (Ahmet III 3271, Kāshān); 3217 UNVERIFIED
Source:
MS Ahmet III 3271 (Kāshān 708/1308, ff. 199a–201b; Piątak's ل) and Ahmet III 3217 (the AY tradition; Piątak's م), known only through Piątak's apparatus
In the reader:
Not shown; their readings are mentioned in the notes where Piątak reports them
Licence:
Manuscripts: public domain; not read directly
Notes
Ahmet III 3271 agrees with AY in الأطهر, الأكبر and بباسط (n. 1220), and differs at nn. 1153 and 1121. Reading both directly is an open item.
UNVERIFIED:
The date of Ahmet III 3217 is not recorded.

Our edition

Our transcription of AYUNVERIFIED · 2026-09-28Our work
By
UNVERIFIED (transcriber (two independent passes from the page images)) · 2026-09-28
Source:
data/sources/taqdis-shams-base.json; method in the text record, §3
In the reader:
In full: 12 passages (the Sun 1–5, then the daily Supreme Sanctification 6–12, although AY has it first); the MS rubrics at the head of passages 1 and 6
Licence:
Ours
Notes
Read from the reproduction at 200 dpi, first in 5-line strips, then a second, independent reading in offset 3-line strips; only then compared with Piątak word by word. Normalised by two rules: hamza in modern orthography, and missing dots or undotted tāʾ marbūṭa supplied where the word is unambiguous. 7 changes listed (2 rules; 1 proofreading correction صو→ضوء; 3 emendations with Piątak: مظهر, بسائطها, لعبيدك (provisional); 1 word division ما لا تناهى), 14 uncertain readings listed. AY's own vowels recorded only selectively (the tanwīn of أهلاً; the accusatives in passage 11). Punctuation is ours. Quotations: no verbatim Quran (a skeleton search found none); two allusions checked against Tanzil (2:255/3:2/20:111; 37:8/38:69); three hadith echoes whose wording was given from memory and is not verified against a hadith text.
UNVERIFIED:
The text record does not say whether AY was transcribed by a person or by AI.

Published translations

Azal's English translationWahid Azal · 2025Copyrighted: cited only
By
Wahid Azal (translator) · 2025
Source:
Wahid Azal, The Prayers to the Orient of Light (Library of the Greatest Name 10, Brisbane 2025): English translation, a "forensic reconstruction" of the Arabic, and the images of AY
In the reader:
Not shown; not consulted
Licence:
In copyright (2025): cited only
Notes
Used only for its reproduction of AY. Its translation was not consulted and its typeset Arabic was not used. An Azalī-Bābī publication with a partisan apparatus: cite it for the reproduction of the MS; do not adopt its framing, its dating (625) or its reconstructed Arabic.

AI layers

Vowelling (supplied vowels)Claude (AI) · 2026-09-28Our work
By
Claude (AI) (vowelling) · 2026-09-28
In the reader:
The vowel marks the AI supplied are shown in amber (per-character mask: 't' from the source, 'a' from AI)
Licence:
Ours; marked AI
Made by:
Claude (Opus; exact version not recorded), 2026-09-28 (first commit of app/src/data/taqdis-shams.json (scripts/recitals/prepare.py taqdis-shams: headless Claude Code, Opus; letters verified unchanged))
Notes
AY is partly vowelled, but only a few of its marks were carried over; prepare.py supplied full tashkīl to all 12 passages, letters verified unchanged, 0 mechanical changes, 45 ambiguities listed. Passage 2 «بحول الله الْمُطَاعُ الْجِرْمُ الْمُنِيرُ»: the establishing pass proposed the genitive الْمُطَاعِ; kept as nominative on review (2026-09-28), disputed, to be checked against Piątak's punctuation and the other MSS. A diplomatic record of AY's own vowels is still to be made.
English translation, passage by passageClaude (AI) · 2026-09-28Our work
By
Claude (AI) (translator) · 2026-09-28
In the reader:
Under each passage
Licence:
Ours; marked AI
Made by:
Claude (Opus; exact version not recorded), 2026-09-28 (first commit of app/src/content/ai/taqdis-shams.json (scripts/recitals/translate.py taqdis-shams opus: headless Claude Code, minimal context))
Notes
Written for this reader from the Arabic (our vowelled text), with the glossary in data/sources/taqdis-shams-meta.json; the model was told not to reproduce or imitate published translations (Corbin/Trask, Goichon, Heath, Thackston, Azal, Hussain, Beneito & Hirtenstein, Austin, Nicholson, Chittick) and was given none. At passage 2 it follows the nominative vowelling («You are the one obeyed»).
Word glossesClaude (AI) · 2026-09-28Our work
By
Claude (AI) (glosses) · 2026-09-28
In the reader:
One gloss per word, in the sense the passage gives it (word panel, and under the words on request)
Licence:
Ours; marked AI
Made by:
Claude (Opus; exact version not recorded), 2026-09-28 (first commit of app/src/content/ai/taqdis-shams.json (scripts/recitals/translate.py taqdis-shams opus: headless Claude Code, minimal context))
Notes
Contextual glosses (1–5 words) for every word id, from the same run as the translation.
Term notesClaude (AI) · 2026-09-28Our work
By
Claude (AI) (notes) · 2026-09-28
In the reader:
Up to six technical terms per passage, each with a one-sentence note, on the word
Licence:
Ours; marked AI
Made by:
Claude (Opus; exact version not recorded), 2026-09-28 (first commit of app/src/content/ai/taqdis-shams.json (scripts/recitals/translate.py taqdis-shams opus: headless Claude Code, minimal context))
Notes
From the same run as the translation, with the Ishrāqī glossary in data/sources/taqdis-shams-meta.json (Hūrakhsh kept as a name).
Resonances: themes and connectionsClaude (AI) · 2026-09-28Our work
By
Claude (AI) (map of themes and connections, by docs/RESONANCES-METHOD.md) · 2026-09-28
In the reader:
For the whole text: themes and 15 connections, on the About page
Licence:
Ours; marked AI
Made by:
Claude (Opus; exact version not recorded), 2026-09-28 (generatedOn of content/resonances/taqdis-shams.json (Claude Code, headless, no web access))
Notes
Every connection states its kind; parallels are resonances, not claims of influence. External references were proposed by the model without web access and are shown only after an agent verified them with a web search.

Automatic analysis

Word analysis (CAMeL Tools)CAMeL Tools 1.6 (NYU Abu Dhabi) · 2026-09-28Our work
By
CAMeL Tools 1.6 (NYU Abu Dhabi) (analyser: calima-msa-r13 + MLE, constrained by the text's vowelling) · 2026-09-28
Source:
scripts/fusus/analyze.py → data/sources/taqdis-shams-analysis.json · link ↗
In the reader:
Lemma, root, part of speech, clitics and pattern, in the word panel
Licence:
Our analysis layer, made offline with CAMeL Tools (code MIT; calima-msa-r13 database GPL v2, not redistributed)
Notes
651 words analysed, 470 with a root, 193 distinct roots, 19 vowel conflicts with the AI vowelling. Automatic and non-generative; date = first commit of the analysis file.
Quran quotations found automaticallyscripts/quran_refs.py · 2026-09-28Our work
By
scripts/quran_refs.py (skeleton matcher against the Tanzil Uthmani text) · 2026-09-28
Source:
app/src/data/quran-refs/taqdis-shams.json
In the reader:
None found
Licence:
Ours
Notes
Quotations verified when the text was established, plus an automatic match on the consonantal skeleton (vowels, Quranic marks, alif spellings and hamza seats ignored): a run of four or more words, or three words of at least 12 letters. No AI.

Audio

Arabic read aloud (machine voice)ar-SA-HamedNeural (Azure AI Speech) · 2026-09-28Our work
By
ar-SA-HamedNeural (Azure AI Speech) (machine voice) · 2026-09-28
In the reader:
Each passage, word by word highlighted
Licence:
Ours; generated on Azure's paid tier, whose terms allow the audio output to be published
Made by:
ar-SA-HamedNeural (Azure AI Speech), 2026-09-28 (first commit of app/src/data/taqdis-shams-audio.json)
Notes
Machine voice reading the vowelled text (including the AI vowels); a reading aid, not a recitation.
English read aloud (machine voice)en-GB-RyanNeural (Azure AI Speech) · 2026-09-28Our work
By
en-GB-RyanNeural (Azure AI Speech) (machine voice) · 2026-09-28
In the reader:
Each passage, word by word highlighted
Licence:
Ours; generated on Azure's paid tier, whose terms allow the audio output to be published
Made by:
en-GB-RyanNeural (Azure AI Speech), 2026-09-28 (first commit of app/src/data/taqdis-shams-audio-en.json)
Notes
Machine voice reading the AI English translation; a reading aid.

✦ marks AI that no person has reviewed yet; ✧ marks AI reviewed by a named person. Copyrighted works are cited, never shown. All sources · How texts are established

Our working notes on this edition: status, witnesses, the decisions taken and why, and what AI supplied. This is a working edition, not an authority.Show the notes
Work / author / datesal-Wāridāt wa-l-taqdīsāt (الواردات والتقديسات, "Inrushes and Sanctifications") · Shihāb al-Dīn Yaḥyā b. Ḥabash al-Suhrawardī, al-Maqtūl (549–587 AH / 1154–1191 CE)
Part addedPart I: Wārid taqdīs al-Shams li-yawm al-aḥad, the Sunday invocation of the Sun as Hūrakhsh (AY f. 20b l. 12 – f. 21b l. 8; Piątak §2.3.9, ¶¶114–117). Part II: Wārid taqdīs al-aʿlā li-kull yawm, the supreme sanctification for every day (AY f. 19b l. 7 – f. 20b l. 11; Piątak §2.3.8, ¶¶107–113). It is short, about 390 words, and it immediately precedes the Sun in the MS, so it is included. In total 12 passages, 651 words.
Library id / filestaqdis-shams · data/sources/taqdis-shams-base.json (established text) · -meta.json · taqdis-shams.json (AI-vowelled, masked) · -analysis.json (CAMeL, ids q1:<n>:<k>) · app/src/content/ai/taqdis-shams.json (AI translation)
Statusworking edition from one manuscript, compared with the critical edition · 28 Sept 2026 · reviewed by: —

Structure. Part I opens with a greeting to the Sun (the living, speaking, most luminous one; the greatest luminary, obedient to its Originator and moving in love for Him; free from rupture, generation and corruption). It then names Hūrakhsh with a string of epithets: vanquisher of darkness, king of the stars, maker of day, vicegerent of the Light of Lights in the world of bodies. There follow a praise of its light and dominance as derived from God's, and a prayer. The prayer is a chain of intercession: the Sun is asked to ask its father (its governing intellect, of which it is the "shadow and talisman"); the victorial lights are asked to ask their father, the Nearest Light; and the Nearest Light is asked to ask the Necessary Existent. What is asked for is that the speaker's soul be illumined, made to long for Him and protected, and that "the people of light and illumination" be helped. Part II is a doxology of God as Necessary Existent. It gives a long run of superlatives, then names Him as creator of the intellects, souls and spheres, affirms the failure of all description, and closes with the talbiya, a petition and a blessing on "the people of light and illumination".

1. Witnesses

SiglumWitnessKindVowelled?LicenceLocation
AY (Piątak's أ)MS Istanbul, Süleymaniye, AyaSofya 2144, ff. 1a–27b, the whole Wāridāt. Copied by Sulaymān b. Masʿūd b. al-Ḥasan, Ramaḍān 652/Oct.–Nov. 1254 (colophon f. 27a). Naskh, 17 lines, nearly fully pointed, partly vowelled. The oldest and complete witness; base of Piątak's edition.MSpartlyMS public domain. The reproduction is © (Azal 2025; Süleymaniye scan terms unknown): privateImages: Azal 2025, PDF pp. 316–318 (sha256 of the PDF 9bfc539f…0736). Rendered crops are in the private layer.
PŁukasz Piątak, Between philosophy, mysticism and magic. A critical edition of occult writings of and attributed to Shihāb al-Dīn al-Suhrawardī, PhD, University of Warsaw, 2019. §2.3.8 = printed pp. 146–150 (PDF 147–151); §2.3.9 = pp. 150–154 (PDF 151–155). Apparatus sigla: ل Ahmet III 3271 (Kāshān 708/1308, ff. 199a–201b); م Ahmet III 3217 (AY tradition); ر Ragıp Paşa 1480 and مم, ن (Ahmet III 3232) for §2.3.8. Printed sources: S = al-Ṣafadī, al-Wāfī (§2.3.8); for §2.3.9, H = Muʿīn (from the lost Mishkāt MS), M = Malikī, Sitāyish va niyāyish, T = Quṭb al-Dīn, Sharḥ Ḥikmat al-ishrāq with Mullā Ṣadrā's glosses (ed. Mūsawī 1391 sh.).critical ed.Quran and hard words onlyOpen download (UW repository, rights field "FairUse"); thesis ©. Poland may give a neighbouring right in critical editions (Art. 99³ of the Polish copyright act, as I understand it; not verified): private, comparison onlythe private layer (sha256 6b930dc9…489c) from https://repozytorium.uw.edu.pl/handle/item/3265. The text layer has font-mapping errors (هللا, ابلنور, احلمك…), so the pages were read as rendered images.
AZWahid Azal, The Prayers to the Orient of Light (Library of the Greatest Name 10, Brisbane 2025). English translation, a "forensic reconstruction" of the Arabic, and the AY images.translation + reconstructed textyes© 2025: privatea private copy. Used here only for its reproduction of AY. Its typeset Arabic was not used (its text layer is empty and it was not needed); its translation was not consulted.
—Ahmet III 3271 and 3217: not read directly (Azal reproduces only selections; this passage was not checked there). Known only through P's apparatus.MSopen item

2. Base and why

The base is our own transcription of AY. It is the oldest and complete witness and the base of the critical edition. Its text is public domain; the reading is ours. The survey (docs/research/prayers-sources.md §4 no. 4) recommends this and it was followed. Order of weight for adjudication: P (critical text and apparatus), then AY, then everything else. But the public text is AY. P's readings are adopted only where AY cannot be construed, and then as a listed change with P's note cited. P's constituted text is not copied.

3. Method

  1. The PDF pages were rendered at 200 dpi (pdftoppm -r 200 -f 316 -l 318; the embedded images are 2069×1497, so 200 dpi is an upscale). Each folio was cropped into 5-line strips, and every strip was transcribed from the image.
  2. Second, independent proofreading pass: new offset crops in 3-line bands, read again against the draft. Doubtful words were zoomed separately (the Sun rubric; مطهى; حايل; the line with بباسط; أنت الله).
  3. Only then was the draft compared with P's rendered pages, word by word, including every apparatus note that concerns أ. Where our image reading and P's report of AY differ, we kept our reading and listed it (see §4; an example is أنت الله).
  4. Normalisation, recorded as two rules in changes:
    • hamza is written in modern orthography (the MS writes bare alif, ي for ئ, and no final hamza);
    • missing dots and undotted tāʾ marbūṭa are supplied where the word is unambiguous. Everything else that changes a letter is listed individually with folio and reason.
  5. Vowels: AY is partly vowelled, but only a few marks were carried over (the tanwīn of أهلاً; the accusatives أينًا … وصفًا in passage 11). A full diplomatic record of AY's vowels was not made. The AI step (prepare.py) then vowelled the text, with a per-character mask.
  6. Segmentation: 12 passages of 39–68 words at natural breaks. The Sun comes first (1–5) as the principal text; the daily sanctification follows (6–12), although in AY it comes first. Each passage carries its folio and lines. MS rubrics are kept at the head of passages 1 and 6.
  7. Quran: there are no verbatim Quran quotations. A skeleton finder with the same thresholds as quran_refs.py (≥4 words, or 3 words with ≥12 letters) found none. Two allusions were recorded, checked against the Tanzil Uthmani text: يا حي يا قيوم (2:255, 3:2, 20:111) and الملإ الأنور الأعلى (37:8, 38:69, «ٱلْمَلَإِ ٱلْأَعْلَىٰ» with الأنور inserted). Three hadith echoes were recorded: سبوح قدوس; منك السلام; the talbiya لبيك اللهم لبيك. Their wording was given from memory of Muslim and al-Bukhārī and is not verified against a hadith text.

4. Decisions and comparison with Piątak

  • Changes: 7. Two are rules (hamza; dotting). One is a proofreading correction: صو→ضوء. Three are emendations adopted with P: مطهر→مظهر, بسابطها→بسائطها, and ليعبدك→لعبيدك (provisional). One is word division: ملا تناهى→ما لا تناهى.
  • Uncertain: 14. They are listed in uncertain. The main ones are the Sun rubric أوراد (every other rubric in AY reads وارد); والحره (unresolved, as it is in P); حائل المكان (P prints حلول); الأبوين (P الأيون); and the missing «أسألك أن تفيض…» in passage 12.
  • Differences from P's constituted text: 32 units (listed in comparison.items with P's apparatus note):
    • 21 substantive readings where AY differs from P's text and P's apparatus reports it (for جميع/بجميع his note implies AY has بجميع, which our image does not show). Examples: الأطهر/الأظهر; السيد/السيار; الأكبر/أكبر; بباسط/باسط; المجرد/المجرّدة; الأول/أوّل; مع/والواحد من; الأبرى/الأبهى; الأجرام/للأجرام; نورك/بنورك; الأبوين/الأيون; فلا ضد; أرقاب; تناهى/يتناهى. Also the omissions in AY: ومعشوقهم, أنت, [و]هم, لا, ولا يتصل بك شيء, and أسألك أن تفيض عليّ أنوارك المشرقة.
    • 3 where our emendation agrees with P's text: مظهر, بسائطها, لعبيدك.
    • 1 apparatus disagreement. P n. 1167 says «أنت الله» is omitted in أ, but AY f. 20b l. 6 clearly reads «أنت الله لا هو إلا هو».
    • 7 readings of AY that P's apparatus does not record (they may be silent normalisations or misreadings on either side). Six are substantive: the rubric أوراد … يوم الأحد (P: وارد … ليوم الأحد); البريئة without و; حائل (P حلول); لا يقدر without و; أو يمدحوا (P ويمدحوا); and فكيف (P وكيف). One is orthographic: الزاكيات (P الزكيات).
  • Ahmet III 3271 (ل) agrees with AY in الأطهر and الأكبر, and at n. 1220 (بباسط). It differs at n. 1153 (لكعبيدك) and n. 1121 (ل = P's text). Its readings are known only via P.

5. Pipeline run (28 Sept 2026)

  • python3 scripts/recitals/prepare.py taqdis-shams: 12/12 passages vowelled, letters verified unchanged, 0 mechanical changes. The AI listed 45 ambiguities, all kept in taqdis-shams.json. One visible AI slip: passage 2 has بِحَوْلِ اللّٰهِ الْمُطَاعُ, where the genitive الْمُطَاعِ ("by the might of God, the obeyed") is needed, and the AI translation followed the error ("You are the one obeyed"). Needs a person's correction.
  • analyze.py taqdis-shams.json taqdis-shams-analysis.json q1: 651 words analysed, 470 with a root, 193 distinct roots, 19 vowel conflicts. The unresolved weak roots are mostly the usual #-radicals (نور/أنوار, إله, وجب…).
  • translate.py taqdis-shams opus: 12/12 passages translated and glossed (AI, marked).

6. Rights and private layers

  • Public: our transcription of AY (a public-domain MS), our apparatus, and short lemmata of P's readings in comparison.items. P's text is not reproduced; the counts and single-word readings are cited to his notes.
  • Private (the private layer, not published): the P PDF, the AY page renders and the crops. Nothing from Azal's typeset text or translation was used or stored.
  • On Azal's framing. Azal 2025 is an Azalī-Bābī publication and its apparatus is partisan: for example, abjad arguments tie Suhrawardī to the Bāb. It also misdates AY to 625 (the colophon, visible in his own reproduction, says «سنة اثني وخمسين وستمائة» = 652). Cite it for its reproduction of the MS; do not adopt its framing, its dating or its "reconstructed" Arabic.

7. Open questions / to review

  1. The Sun rubric أوراد against وارد: confirm on a better image of AY (Süleymaniye scan), and check whether P silently normalised it.
  2. والحره (passage 6): what is it? P leaves it unresolved; other witnesses have الخير or المجد.
  3. حائل المكان (passage 8): AY shows حايل clearly, yet P prints حلول with no AY variant. Did P misreport, or is our image misleading?
  4. جميع / بجميع (passage 10), and «أنت الله» (P n. 1167 against our clear reading): verify on another reproduction.
  5. Should the Ragıp/Ahmet III readings be adopted where AY cannot be construed (لا بالاتصال, the missing «أسألك أن تفيض عليّ أنوارك المشرقة», الأبهى)? At present only three emendations are made; the rest are flagged.
  6. Record AY's own vowels fully (a diplomatic vowel layer). Compare the AI vowelling with them and with P's partial vowelling.
  7. Read Ahmet III 3271 and 3217 directly (Azal reproduces selections; this passage was not checked there). Also find the Mullā Ṣadrā lithograph (Tehran 1315/1897, margin p. 357; P's "T" is a modern edition of it).
  8. Confirm the Polish neighbouring right before any public use of P beyond cited lemmata.
  9. Verify the hadith references against a hadith text in the repo.
  10. Review by a person: every change and uncertain item, and the AI vowelling of passage 2.

8. Change log

  • 2026-09-28: AY ff. 19b–21b transcribed (two passes), compared with Piątak 2019 §§2.3.8–9, 12 passages established; pipeline run (vowelling, analysis, AI translation).

Review note (2026-09-28)

  • ¶2 «بحول الله الْمُطَاعُ الْجِرْمُ الْمُنِيرُ»: the establishing pass proposed the genitive «الْمُطَاعِ» (as an epithet of God). Kept as nominative: «الجرم المنير» can only describe the Sun, so «المطاع» most naturally opens the run of epithets addressed to the Sun ("[you are] the Obeyed, the shining body …"). Disputed; to be checked against Piątak's punctuation and the other manuscripts.